Does Bitcoin meet the definition of a Ponzi scheme? That is the topic of the most recent Cointelegraph Crypto Duel, the place Bitcoin strategist at Kraken meets professor of pc science on the College of Campinas, Jorge Stolfi.
Much like different Bitcoin skeptics, Stolfi repeatedly outlined Bitcoin as a Ponzi scheme. The core of his argument is that Bitcoin doesn’t produce any money flows and the cash with which Bitcoin buyers are paid comes completely from new buyers shopping for Bitcoin.
“Each time you put money into Bitcoin, the cash that you just make investments goes to the earlier buyers or to the miners and disappears”, Stolfi stated.
Responding to Stolfi’s argument, Rochard identified that Bitcoin is a peer-to-peer money system and, like different types of cash, it’s not supposed to provide a money circulate.
“It is only a common property of cash as a result of it’s money. So it would not have money flows and that does not make it a Ponzi scheme.”, Rochard stated.
Rochard additionally identified that Bitcoin is totally different from Ponzi schemes in that it doesn’t assure mounted returns, and is well-known to be a extremely dangerous asset.
“Bitcoin’s promoters repeatedly emphasize that there’s a danger of loss and that if we have a look at the empirical information, this danger has repeatedly been realized”, stated Rochard. “That is not how Ponzi schemes work”, he added.
Stolfi, nevertheless, is satisfied that efficient Ponzi schemes don’t promise return since that will be “a lifeless giveaway.” “The S.E.C. would come knocking at your door the subsequent day”, he argued.
For example, the pc scientist talked about the infamous Madoff’s Ponzi scheme, which defrauded 1000’s of buyers for $65 billion. “He did not promise something. […] The explanation why folks invested in it’s that he was paying all people who wished to money out”.
Choose your aspect and watch the total debate on Cointelegraph’s Youtube channel!